Being-as-that-may has in its own prescience a preponderance of limitation which unconceals the moment of Being-on-time.  Being-on-time is a self-valuing consciousness which applauds its own success at thwarting the exigencies of Being-as-that-may.  The power of Being-as-that-may as it unconceals its negation in the realm of Being-in-the-world lays a temporal trap for Being-on-time, which, in its own cognition of the Will of the Absolute, strives to produce an effect of empowerment beyond the limitations of Being-on-the-way.  The unequal and illigitimate loss of symmetry and equity in the social sphere of Being-together-for-dinner, for example, is dealt with by addressing the self-authenticating hubris of doubtful causal explanations and the re-interpretation of Not-being-on-time as Being-just-in-time, despite the compelling drama of striving to overcome the Being-for-itself which is revealed in its alienation to exist only as Being-in-the-way.  The ontological implications of Being-on-time are not moot, as the alternative consciousness to Being-on-time is inevitably that of Being-between-a-rock- and-a-hard-place.

*Based in part on Martin  Heidegger's statement:

The ideas of a 'pure "I"' and of a 'consciousness in general' are so far from including the a priori character of 'actual' subjectivity  that the ontological characters of Dasein's facticity and its state of Being are either passed over or not seen at all.

Being and Time, I.6 (229).